Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 2021 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2240362

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare professionals has been significant. The aim of this study was to explore the mental state and wellbeing of UK junior doctors at different phases of the initial outbreak. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of UK-based junior doctors' perceptions of threat and support during and after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Levels of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and use of coping mechanisms were explored through a Google questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-six participants were included in this study (93 in period A and 103 in period B). Junior doctors reported feeling increased risk (p=0.001) and increased fear of contracting the virus (p<0.001) during period A. Increased levels of severe anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 score >15) along with increased cases level of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score >10) were reported for both periods. Junior doctors described suffering more frequently with flashbacks (p=0.006) and nightmares (p=0.024) in comparison with senior colleagues during period A. During period A, 21.4% of participants felt isolated at work (p<0.001), whereas 13% reported being easily annoyed on a daily basis, 11.7% reported very low morale (p<0.001) and 66% were not aware of any psychological support being available. The use of exercise, peer support and mindfulness apps increased during period B (p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare systems need to urgently establish robust psychological support mechanisms and infrastructure to protect junior doctors and provide institutional resilience against the adverse consequences of the long physical and mental battle with COVID-19.

2.
British Journal of Surgery ; 108:1, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1539540
3.
British Journal of Surgery ; 108:27-27, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1537478
4.
Colorectal Disease ; 23(SUPPL 1):109, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1458365

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has impacted diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Efforts to minimise patient contact have caused delays in cancer pathways, generating a potential risk to patient care. We aimed to identify the pandemic effect on colorectal referral pathways. All cancer referrals during March-June 2020 were reviewed to obtain information on the timeline and planning of investigation and treatment. The data was compared to evidence from the same referral period in 2019. 681 referrals were received during March-June 2020, compared to 1032 in 2019, indicating a 34% decrease. The majority of patients were reviewed in telephone clinic (76.2%) rather than physical appointments (15.4%), indicating a change in practice. Although the commonest mode of investigation was endoscopy( 46.2%), there was increased use of CT scan(35.8%). 114(17.1%) patients were not investigated, of which 40(35.1%) declined investigation, primarily due to COVID-19 apprehension. 6 patients were re-referred and 67 were removed from the pathway for unknown reasons. 1 patient was subsequently admitted as an emergency. There were 44 new diagnoses of colorectal cancer based on MDT discussion, of which 14(31.8%) breached the investigation and 20(45.5%) the treatment date. 18 underwent curative surgery compared to 47 in the same period in 2019, indicating 61.7% less operative activity. COVID-19 has changed surgical practice, forcing alternative clinic, investigation and treatment methods. Disruption of colorectal pathways is causing reduced referrals, investigation delays and less surgical activity. Delayed presentation with advanced disease may deprive patients the opportunity of treatment with curative intent.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL